Sig 365xl Vs Glock 48 - For a guy who loves DA/SA cars and snobby revolvers, the Sig P365 XL is probably an odd choice. But I can't deny that this is a great carry-on gun. In this review, I look at the things I learned to like about the P365 XL after 2000 rounds and a few things that could use some improvements.
The Sig Sauer P365 XL is easily the most impressive new gun I've tried in a long time. Today, I want to talk about why it is quickly becoming one of my favorite options for concealed carry.
Sig 365xl Vs Glock 48
This gun belongs to a brand new type of carry semi-automatic. They are neither single stack nor dual stack. I'm somewhere in between.
P365xl Vs Xmacro Grip Incase People Wanted More Visuals
Let's go back to the 1990s - the golden age of double stacks. At the time, a compact pistol was essentially a full-sized double pistol with the handle cut off and the slide and barrel shortened slightly. For a sub-compact, they shortened things a bit more. We can see perfect examples of this in some of the most popular cars of the time; The Glock 19 is compact and the Glock 26 is compact. When all the other gun companies started making their own polymer pistols in the early 2000s, they followed the same basic pattern.
Then, a few years ago, the 9mm single stacked polymer came along and shook things up. In 2012, the Smith & Wesson Shield wasn't the first gun, but it was the gun that lifted a new single-stack from niche to being one of the most popular carry guns in the country. Since then, we've seen dozens of new single-compartment 9mm polymer pistols coming from every sector of the industry. And now we're all sick of them. Especially those of us who have to evaluate and consider these things for a living.
In January 2018, Sig Sauer rescued us from this endless tedium with something actually a little different: the P365. It looks like a new stack. It is the same size as a new stack. But, somehow, they managed to fit ten bullets into this tiny magazine cart. The typical 9mm stackable magazine can hold 6 to 8 rounds, but this isn't really a stackable magazine. The top three or four rounds of the magazine are more or less stacked, but then the magazine tapers outward, and at the bottom the rings are staggered like a double stack.
The gun was a huge hit. He has won all kinds of awards. There were some reliability issues from the start, but the worst seemed to be resolved after the first year or so. Last May, Sig released a version with a frame-mounted, ambidextrous manual safety system. And then last July they released this version: Sig P365 XL.
Sig Sauer P365 Vs Glock G19 Size Comparison
It has the same slim profile as the original P365, but has a longer barrel and a slightly longer grip to load the 12-round magazine. Sig also manufactures an extended 15-round magazine. It's about 3 ounces heavier than the standard P365 at a load of 26.3 ounces. Much of that extra weight comes from the slider and the longer barrel, which is 3.7 inches instead of 3.1. It's available with or without manual safety - this one has it. It has an XSeries direct trigger - this is only available as an aftermarket upgrade on the original P365, but is standard on the XL. It also has a Sig X-RAY3 night vision goggles set as standard and a slide machined to accept a microscopic optical dot.
It's worth asking why I'm interested in this gun or the P365 in general. I am willing to carry a loaded gun most of the time. A single glorified stack with a few extra rounds in the journal didn't help me much. If I were to seriously consider a carry gun for personal use, it should be very easy to shoot, very portable, and it should meet my personal safety standards. I'll come back to the first two in a minute. Let me remove the fuse first. Or maybe "risk management" is a better term.
If you've been watching my videos for a while you'll know that for semi-automatics I generally prefer hammer guns, whether they're double acting or double/single acting. I like having the ability to clamp the hammer with my thumb so the gun can't fire while it's loaded. The Striker controller available for Glocks is the next best choice. It does the same thing as a hammer when you coat. Manual safety is a far-fetched third option, but depending on how it's designed I would consider it for a carry gun.
I don't think fuses are for everyone. I'm particularly reluctant to recommend manual safety for beginners or anyone who doesn't practice regularly. But I will draw and rework a gun that carries a thousand and thousands of times, both in reality and at range. Every slip has the potential to turn into a catastrophic accident. All that is needed is a distraction – a momentary distraction.
Head To Head: Sig P365 Vs Glock 48
So in addition to following all the best practices for safe gun handling and safe re-tape, I would like to have at least an extra layer of mechanical safety to help reduce the risk. I especially like if that extra class doesn't affect the weapon's usability. Whether or not this manual safety does that is debatable.
I'm about to give this gun a lot of love and talk about how awesome it is. But this manual safety is not good. It's not terrible either. It doesn't look like the lousy core of safety you'll find as an option on the Smith & Wesson Shield. And it's not as bad as the uncanny safety on the LCP .22 LR that I talked about a few weeks ago. It has a very aggressive click and is ambidextrous. It could still be much better. It's not wide enough and needs to be positioned farther forward about 1/4 inch above the frame.
I don't know why the gun companies keep messing with this. I think that's more proof that the people who made these design decisions weren't actually shooting guns. There are plenty of examples of good manual fuses, so there's no reason not to know what they look like.
I mentioned the safety of the M&P 22 Compact earlier. This is great security. It's not big at all, but it's wide enough that you can put your thumb on it when shooting. When you grip the gun, the thumb knuckle will automatically lower through the safety pin to release it. You can not miss it. The P365's secure was just big enough to use and small enough that I occasionally missed it on my first try. And if I put my thumb on it, this sharp back edge will rub against my thumb when the gun is retracted.
Finally Ditching The G19. Need New Ccw Piece. 43x Vs Sig 365xl Vs Sig P320x.
It was just annoying at first, but over a long period of time it really would cut my thumb. Right now, I have a nice little blood blister there under the scar tissue from the first two times it happened. Honestly, I could live with it if the safety were broader and easier to disable. Sig, please take some sweet money from charging $50 per magazine for these and give it to your R&D team for them to fix this safe.
The appeal of the Sig P365 XL is not only that it is small and therefore easy to carry. Lots of small guns. This weapon is small and can be fired. And it's small in a way that's different from other pistols. Let's look at some size comparisons so I can show you what I mean.
Here, on the right, we have the world's most popular compact 9mm, the Glock 19. On the left is Glock's unique 9mm, the Glock 43. It's not the smallest 9mm out there, but I do. think it's among the 9 smallest still reasonable. can shoot.
I'm going to overlap these two and arrange them with a snap clip. This is the highest part of the handle where the grid of your hand will go. Obviously, the 43 has a shorter slide and grip, and the trigger radius is also a bit shorter.
Sig Sauer P365 [review+video]: Still The Standard?
If we look from the back, the 43 is noticeably thinner. I measured the widest part of the stock, excluding the magazine, and it was 0.81 inches for the 43 and 1.31 inches for the 19.
Now
Sig 365xl holster, sig 365xl romeo zero holster, best holster for sig 365xl, glock sig sauer, holster for sig 365xl, best sig 365xl holster, sig 365xl iwb holster, sig 365xl appendix holster, sig 365xl owb holster, glock 31 357 sig review, sig sauer 365xl holster, holster for sig 365xl with romeo zero
0 Comments